Search Results

The AUC approved EDTI’s proposed Rider J in the amount of a refund of $8.99 million, effective July 1, 2016 to September 30, 2016.

ATCO Gas, ATCO Pipelines and ATCO Electric Ltd. (collectively, “ATCO”) submitted a compliance filing based on the direction in Decision 2014-169 respecting ATCO’s 2010 Evergreen application.

The AUC directed ATCO to update the 2016 and 2017 forecast amounts of $48.2 million and $61.1 million in the compliance filing to this decision.

The AUC approved EEA’s compliance filing to Decision 2941-D01-2015 as filed, with the exception of the backstop supply mechanism, for which EEA was directed to file a new application in Proceeding 20342.

The AUC directed EDTI to file a compliance filing in accordance with the directions in this decision on or before March 16, 2016.

The AUC directed EDTI to file a compliance filing in accordance with the directions in this decision on or before March 16, 2016.

The AUC directed EDTI to file a compliance filing in accordance with the directions in this decision on or before March 16, 2016.

The AUC approved ATCO’s 2016 TFO tariff on an interim basis at $63.2 million per month, effective January 1, 2016 until otherwise directed by the AUC.

In finding that AltaLink’s decision making was not imprudent, the AUC held that AltaLink’s claimed costs for the SW Project were therefore approved as filed.

The AUC approved the AESO’s deferral account reconciliation application as filed.

Download ReportInterim Tariff AltaLink Management Ltd. (“AltaLink”) applied for approval of its 2016 interim transmission facility owner (“TFO”) tariff. AltaLink requested to continue recovering its 2015 interim TFO tariff as approved in Decision 3504-D01-2015,...

The AUC ordered that the Fortis’ 2016 rates, options and riders, set out in Appendix 5 of the decision be approved effective January 1, 2016 on an interim basis.

Download ReportPerformance-Based Regulation Rate Adjustment ATCO Electric Ltd. (“ATCO”) applied to the AUC for approval of its 2016 annual performance-based regulation (“PBR”) rate adjustment filing, requesting approval of its electric distribution services rates,...

The AUC approved ENMAX’s request to continue with its 2015 transmission tariff on an interim and refundable basis.

The AUC held that, according to section 82(6)(a) of the EUA, it must approve the annualized amount without modification.

The AUC approved ENMAX’s net TACDA rider collection of $3,796,899, effective January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016, as filed.

The AUC approved the application on an interim refundable basis to be effective January 1, 2016, noting that no parties objected to the approval on an interim refundable basis.

The AUC approved FAI’s application as filed, to refund $10.917 million to customers effective January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 through a percentage-based transmission adjustment rider methodology to be determined as part of FAI’s 2016 annual PBR rate adjustment application.

The AUC approved ATCO’s application as filed, to refund $4.225 million to customers effective January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016.

Download ReportInterim Regulated Rate Tariff EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. (“EEA”) applied for approval of its 2016 interim non-energy regulated rate tariff (“RRT”) effective January 1, 2016. EEA’s application was applicable to its 2016 RRT service provided to the...

The AUC directed Red Deer to remit to the Alberta Electric System Operator $323,676 to true up its 2015 interim TFO rate to the 2015 final approved TFO rate for costs collected between January 1, 2015 and September 30, 2015.

The AUC approved EDTI’s 2015-2017 General Tariff Application application subject to the findings directions and conclusions in the decision. The AUC therefore ordered EDTI to submit a compliance filing addressing the directions in the decision.

The AUC approved EDTI’s 2015-2017 General Tariff Application application subject to the findings directions and conclusions in the decision. The AUC therefore ordered EDTI to submit a compliance filing addressing the directions in the decision.

The approved the sale and transfer of the assets, finding it to be in the public interest. The AUC found that the the purchase price to be paid by Fortis for the VNM assets using the replacement cost new less depreciation formula to be prudent and consistent with prior approvals.

Download ReportCapital Tracker Compliance In response to directions from the AUC provided in Decision 3220-D01-2015, FortisAlberta Inc. (“FAI”) requested approval of its 2013-2015 Capital Tracker compliance filing. FAI’s original 2013-2015 Capital Tracker application...

Download ReportGeneral Tariff Application - Refiling TransAlta Corporation, as Manager of the TransAlta Generation Partnership (“TransAlta”) applied for approval of its 2013-2014 general tariff application (“GTA”) refiling pursuant to the directions issued in Decision...

the AUC determined that the sale of Kingman’s assets to Fortis was in the public interest.
The AUC granted Kingman’s application to cease to operate under section 29 of the HEEA, provided that the facilities are transferred to Fortis. The AUC ordered the transfer of the Kingman service area to Fortis pursuant to section 32 of the HEEA, and further directed Kingman to sell (and Fortis to purchase and operate) Kingman’s assets in accordance with the asset purchase agreement. The AUC found that the purchase price was prudent and consistent with prior approvals.

The AUC found that EPC reflected the effects of Decision 2191-D01-2015 in its compliance filing, and therefore complied with Direction 14. The AUC determined that it would exercise its discretion pursuant to section 29(7) of the Alberta Utilities Commission Act to approve the distribution and transmission rates on an interim basis pending the outcome of the appeal proceedings.

Download ReportAUC Review – Deferral Accounts EPCOR Distribution & Transmission Inc. (“EDTI”), on behalf of ATCO Electric Ltd. (“AE”), ENMAX Power Corporation (“ENMAX”) and FortisAlberta Inc. (“FAI”), (collectively, the “DFOs”) filed a joint application for...

The AUC determined that without support from the Customers, the Alberta Utilities’ proposal to set the 2016 ROE and capital structures at levels approved in Decision 2191-D01-2015 would not be in the public interest. The AUC therefore opted to initiate a normal course generic cost of capital proceeding for 2016 and 2017.

The AUC  ordered Red Deer to provide a compliance filing within 60 days of this decision and reconcile the following deferral accounts in its next application: (a) Return on equity; (b) Direct-assign capital; (c) Hearing cost reserve; and (d) Self-insurance reserve.

Download ReportUpdated Transmission Facility Owner Tariff – Interim Basis ATCO Electric Ltd. (“ATCO”) applied for its updated 2015 transmission facility owner (“TFO”) tariff on an interim basis, effective June 1, 2015. ATCO initially applied a revenue requirement for...

Download ReportCompliance Filing – Non-energy Regulated Rate Tariff Pursuant to the AUC’s directions made in Decision 2014-303 (“Decision 2014-303”), EPCOR Energy Alberta GP Inc. (“EEA”) filed a compliance filing with respect to its 2014-2015 non-energy regulated rate...