Regulatory Law Chambers logo

ATCO Electric Ltd. Approval of Amounts to be Paid into and Out of the Balancing Pool for the Sale of Isolated Generating Units, AUC Decision 26953-D01-2021

Link to Decision Summarized

Isolated Generating Units – Net Book Value

In this decision, the AUC approved the application from ATCO Electric Ltd. (“AE”) to pay a total amount of $1,674,560.60 to the Balancing Pool under Section 22(1) of the Isolated Generating Units and Customer Choice Regulation, following its sale of its isolated generating units at its Garden River Power Plant.

Introduction

AE, as a transmission facility owner, provides transmission service to isolated communities in Alberta using isolated generating units. When an isolated generating unit is no longer needed, AE may sell the isolated generating unit and must follow the process set out in Part 2 of the Isolated Generating Units and Customer Choice Regulation.

AE requested that the AUC approve payment in the amount of $2,409.40 to AE from the Balancing Pool in respect of selling costs; $15,000.00 from AE to the Balancing Pool for sale proceeds; and payment of $1,661,970.00 from AE to the Balancing Pool for the remaining net book value of the isolated generating units.

Analysis

The Balancing Pool raised a concern with what it asserted was AEs inclusion of $250,176.05 for dismantling costs in AE’s net book value calculation. The Balancing Pool questioned if dismantling costs should be claimable in the current application as part of the isolated generating units’ net book value.

The AUC found that the dismantling costs noted by the Balancing Pool do not affect the net book value calculation as these costs are offset entirely with what was previously collected by AE through its previous collections of net salvage, and therefore results in a net book value of zero. The AUC further found that AE’s selling costs and sale proceeds were reasonable.

The AUC approved the total amount of $1,674,560.60 to be paid by AE to the Balancing Pool under Section 22(1) of the Isolated Generating Units and Customer Choice Regulation.

Related Posts

Sabo v AltaLink Management Ltd, 2024 ABCA 179

Sabo v AltaLink Management Ltd, 2024 ABCA 179

Link to Decision Summarized Download Summary in PDF Authority – Compensation Award Application On appeal from AltaLink Management Ltd. (“AML”), the Alberta Court of Appeal (“ABCA”) considered...