Regulatory Law Chambers logo

ATCO Gas, a Division of ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. 2022 Weather Deferral Account Rate Rider W South, AUC Decision 27415-D01-2022

Link to Decision Summarized

Electricity – Rates

Application

ATCO Gas, a division of ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd., applied for an approval of a Rate Rider W (“2022 Rider W”), effective September 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023, to collect ATCO Gas’ South weather deferral account (“WDA”) balance of approximately $10.677 million as of April 30, 2022. ATCO Gas provided evidence that this collection period would not result in rate shock and that it would have minimal impact on customers as the 2022 Rider W would change rates by approximately one percent over both rate groups over the collection period.

Decision

Since the initial approval of the WDA on January 1, 2008 did not stipulate that the time period could not be altered, the AUC approved ATCO Gas’s request for an eight-month collection period for the 2022 Rider W. The AUC approved the WDA collection of $10.677 million from ATCO Gas South customers by way of the 2022 Rider W from September 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023.

Applicable Legislation

AUC Decision 2008-113 – ATCO Gas re 2008-2009 General Rate Application Phase I

AUC Decision 24665-D01-2019 – ATCO Gas, a division of ATCO Gas and Pipelines Ltd. re 2019 Weather Deferral Account Rate Rider W North

Pertinent Issues

ATCO Gas has both fixed and variable costs. Only the variable costs are sales volume dependent. ATCO Gas recovers a portion of the fixed costs through the variable component of the rates; however, variation in weather can result in an over-or-under collection of the approved revenue, for which there is already an AUC-approved deferral account to record the variances in revenue related to weather.

Related Posts

Yatar v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex, 2024 SCC 8

Yatar v. TD Insurance Meloche Monnex, 2024 SCC 8

Link to Decision Summarized Download Summary in PDF Administrative Law – Judicial Review v. Statutory Appeal Application Ummugulsum Yatar (“Ms. Yatar”) contested the denial of her insurance...