Regulatory Law Chambers logo

Request for Regulatory Appeal of NEP Canada ULC Licences (AER No. Appeal 1862322)

Request for Regulatory Appeal of Licences – Regulatory Appeal Request Denied

On December 7, 2016, the AER issued a decision denying Allen Pukanski’s request for a regulatory appeal of certain well licences issued to NEP Canada ULC (“NEP”).

Concerns Raised

Mr. Pukanski’s submission in support of his appeal request outlined his concerns related to noise, excess flaring, and issues communicating with NEP. Mr. Pukanski submitted that these issues caused health problems, including lack of sleep and stress.

AER Decision

The AER denied Mr. Pukanski’s regulatory appeal request on the grounds that he was not an “eligible person” for the purpose of REDA section 39.

Specifically, the AER held that the information provided by Mr. Pukanski was general in nature and did not provide specific information showing he would or may be adversely and directly affected by the issuance of the NEP licences. In addition, the AER noted that some of his concerns related to matters that had already been resolved.

Related Posts

Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36

Auer v. Auer, 2024 SCC 36

Link to Decision Summarized Download Summary in PDF Appeal – Standard of Review What standard of review applies when we determine whether a regulation is established within the scope of the enabling...