Regulatory Law Chambers logo

Search Results

These articles by our expert team cover the details of various decisions made by the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER), Alberta Utilities Commision (AUC), and Canada Energy Regulator (CER). Browse our searchable archive below to learn more about the results we’ve achieved for our clients.

Sawyer v. TransCanada Pipeline Limited (2017 FCA 159)

Decision ReportFederal Work and Undertaking - Section 92(1)(a) – NEB Jurisdiction – Prima Facie Test In this decision, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) considered an appeal by Mr. Sawyer from an NEB decision (the “NEB Decision”). The NEB Decision subject to appeal...

Goodhart v Alberta Energy Regulator, 2017 ABCA 22

Download ReportApplication for Extension of Time to Appeal – Application Denied – AER Does not Owe Private Duty of Care In Goodhart v Alberta Energy Regulator, the ABCA considered Mr. Goodhart’s application seeking an extension of time to file his appeal of an ABQB...

Reasons for Decision: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. – Line 10 Westover Segment Replacement Project (OH-001-2016)

The NEB concluded that Enbridge’s design and implementation of its Project-specific public and Aboriginal engagement activities were appropriate for the scope and scale of the Project. The NEB found that all Aboriginal groups potentially affected by the Project were provided with sufficient information and opportunities to make their views about the Project known to Enbridge and to the NEB.

Coulas v. Ferus Natural Gas Fuels Inc. (2016 ABCA 332)

In Coulas v. Ferus Natural Gas Fuels Inc., 2016 ABCA 332 (the “ABCA Decision”), the ABCA considered Silvia Coulas’ application for leave to appeal an AER decision (the “AER Decision”). The AER Decision denied Coulas’ application for a regulatory appeal of the liquid natural gas (“LNG”) facility licence the AER issued to Ferus Natural Gas (“Ferus”).

Orphan Well Assn. v Grant Thornton Ltd. (2016 ABCA 238)

The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (“CAPP”), the Canadian Association of Insolvency and Restructuring Professionals (“CAIRP”), the Attorney General for Saskatchewan (“Saskatchewan”), Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of British Columbia as represented by the Ministry of Natural Gas Development and the British Columbia (“BC”) Oil and Gas Commission (the “BC Applicants”) (collectively, the “Intervener Applicants”), sought leave from the Alberta Court of Appeal (“ABCA”) to participate as interveners in a Constitutional appeal concerning division of powers and the doctrine of paramountcy.

Pembina Pipeline Corporation Applications for Two Pipelines Fox Creek to Namao Pipeline Expansion Project (2016 ABAER 004)

Pembina applied for 15 pipeline agreements in the area covered by the forested portion of the province of Alberta, that includes the mountains and foothills along Alberta’s Western boundary (the “Green Area”) for access to a permanent right-of-way (“ROW”). Pembina applied for approval of a conservation and reclamation plan including a construction and post-construction reclamation plan along the settled portion of the route within the province of Alberta, encompassing the populated southern, central and Peace River areas (the “White Area”).

Enbridge Line 10 Westover Segment Replacement (NEB Hearing Order OH-001-2016)

The NEB released a hearing order for Enbridge’s application to replace the Westover Segment of its line 10 pipeline, which consists of replacing 32 kilometers of existing 12 inch diameter pipeline with approximately 35 kilometers of new 20 inch diameter pipeline from Enbridge’s Westover Terminal to its Nanticoke Junction facility in Hamilton, Ontario.

NEB postpones Trans Mountain Expansion Oral Hearings

The NEB announced that it was postponing the oral portion of Hearing Order OH-001-2014 for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (the “Project”), and that it was further taking the step of striking from the record all evidence prepared by or under the direction of Mr. Steven J. Kelly of IHS Global Canada Limited in Hearing Order OH-001-2014.

Jessica Ernst v Alberta Energy Regulator (2015 CanLII 23001)

Download ReportLeave to Appeal The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) granted Jessica Ernst leave to appeal the judgment of the Alberta Court of Appeal (“ABCA”) in Ernst v Alberta (Energy Resources Conservation Board), 2014 ABCA 285. In the decision on which the SCC has...